loudness.ai
Signal tracing / Hum & buzz

Microphone hum: find what is causing the buzz

Start by checking whether the hum is in your saved recording or only in your speakers. Then change one connection at a time. A low electrical hum needs different checks from a broad background hiss.

Microphone → input

If hum is saved into the file, investigate this side first.

Follow this path

Saved recording

Play the exact same file on a second device. This separates capture from playback.

Follow this path

Output → speakers

If only these speakers hum, changing the recording will not fix the source.

Follow this path

First, check where the hum is heard

Use Mic Test to save a short recording with a spoken sentence and a pause. Play that same file through headphones, then through a second listening setup. Keep the listening volume comfortable. If only the speakers hum, Focusrite’s monitor-hum troubleshooting guide helps you investigate the playback connections.

What you observeWhat to check next
The file hums on both setupsThe recording path: microphone, cable, interface and connected devices.
Only one pair of speakers humsThe playback path before applying cleanup to the file.
Hum starts when another device is connectedThat connection and the equipment on either side of it.

Write down what changed. A quieter second setup narrows the search; it does not identify a faulty part by itself.

Hum, buzz or hiss?

Electrical hum often has a low, steady pitch around 50 or 60 Hz. Higher multiples of that frequency can make it sound more like a buzz. A broad “shhh” has a different character; use the microphone hiss troubleshooting guide for that sound. If the sound follows air moving through the room instead, use the fan-noise guide’s placement and airflow checks to investigate that source.

A 50/60 Hz peak is a clue, not proof of a ground loop. Shure’s explanation of microphone hum pickup describes how nearby electrical fields can also reach microphones. The useful question is which change makes the noise appear, disappear or change level.

Check cables and connected equipment

  1. Mute the input and speakers before changing audio cables. For an XLR microphone, follow its instructions for switching phantom power off before disconnecting it.
  2. Try a known-good, compatible cable. For a USB mic, compare a direct computer connection with the hub connection you normally use. Save a new test after each change.
  3. Move the microphone and its audio cable away from power adapters and lighting equipment. Keep your speaking distance the same for the comparison.
  4. Sennheiser’s ground-loop troubleshooting guide provides more detail on tracing connected equipment. Remove optional audio connections one at a time, following the equipment instructions. Reconnect them individually and note which connection brings back the hum.

Keep the protective earth on power cables intact. Do not remove a ground pin or open a power adapter to cure hum. Ask the equipment manufacturer about compatible audio isolation if one connection is responsible.

A connection log that identifies the next test

Use the rows below as a worksheet. These are possible outcomes to interpret, not measurements of your equipment. Start from the same baseline before each test; otherwise two changes can cancel each other and hide the cause.

TestIf this happensFollow-up
Saved file on another deviceClean elsewhere; hum only in desk speakers.Keep the recording. Inspect the speaker audio connections and output path.
Laptop on battery, where supportedHum changes when its charger is removed normally.Restore the charger and confirm it returns. This implicates that configuration, not automatically a defective charger. Ask the manufacturer about compatible isolation.
One optional audio device removedHum stops, then returns on reconnection.Check that cable and both connected devices. Change a compatible cable before replacing either device.
Mic moved away from a power adapterThe noise changes with position.Keep the improved separation; repeat with the same speaking distance. Investigate nearby interference before assuming a loop.

Two reductions—and a buzz that remains

These English audiobook passages use three real narrators. We added controlled hum to each source, then processed that same recording with Noise Removal. The voice levels are matched for comparison, and the original pauses are retained. The noise was not captured by the narrators’ microphones.

1. Garth Comira — 50 Hz hum with a few higher tones. Compare the low sound in the pause and under the voice.

Garth Comira — Before: voice with added hum
Download WAV
Garth Comira — After: Noise Removal
Download WAV
Inspect the before-and-after spectrogram
Garth Comira: hum spectrograms, before above and after below, with identical time, frequency and colour scales.
Follow the straight horizontal bands through the pauses. They come from the added hum and become weaker after processing. The rising and falling patterns during speech are different: they include the voice.
Open full-size chart

2. Heather Barnett — stronger 60 Hz hum. Listen to the softer words as well as the background. Keep the headphone volume unchanged.

Heather Barnett — Before: voice with added hum
Download WAV
Heather Barnett — After: Noise Removal
Download WAV
Inspect the before-and-after spectrogram
Heather Barnett: hum spectrograms, before above and after below, with identical time, frequency and colour scales.
The steady bands near the bottom of the upper chart show the added hum. Compare those same frequencies below, then listen for any unwanted change to the lower part of the voice.
Open full-size chart

3. Anders Lankford — a richer 60 Hz buzz with more higher tones. This is the difficult example: the buzz largely remains after processing. Compare it with the first two before deciding whether the result is useful.

Anders Lankford — Before: voice with added hum
Download WAV
Anders Lankford — After: Noise Removal
Download WAV
Inspect the before-and-after spectrogram
Anders Lankford: hum spectrograms, before above and after below, with identical time, frequency and colour scales.
Several straight bands remain across the pauses after processing. This is the difficult buzz example: the chart supports what the comparison is meant to reveal, rather than suggesting that all the noise disappeared.
Open full-size chart

In the same short noise-only opening, the measured level falls by about 38 dB, 40 dB and 0.13 dB respectively. Those figures describe that pause in these files; listen to the spoken words too. A quiet pause alone does not establish a clear, natural voice.

Reduce hum in an existing recording

Keep the original file. Try Audio Enhancer’s Noise Removal on a short passage with speech and a pause, then compare it at the same voice level. If the buzz remains or the voice loses detail, avoid repeatedly processing the whole file.

For steady tonal noise, follow Audacity’s notch-filter instructions to target the measured frequency with a narrow cut. Check the noise-only section for higher multiples too. Cutting a wide band or removing every low frequency can change the voice. Compare and undo changes that make speech worse.

In Audacity, select a noise-only pause and use Plot Spectrum to locate the peak. Try a narrow notch at that measured frequency, preview, then compare the voice with the unfiltered original. Inspect higher peaks individually. Do not apply a whole series of 50/60 Hz cuts merely because you know your country’s mains frequency.

Repeat the test after fixing the source

Record the same sentence and pause again with Mic Test. Match voice volume when comparing the old and new takes, and write down the cable or device change that helped. If the noise returns, that note gives you a useful starting point.

Fixing the source prevents hum from entering the next recording. Software cleanup only works on audio that has already been captured. If an important passage still sounds damaged, a fresh take may be the more useful result.

How to read the before-and-after graphs

A spectrogram shows how sound changes over time. Read left to right through the recording; higher frequencies are higher up. Bright yellow means a stronger signal at that frequency. Purple and black show weaker sound.

Yellow does not automatically mean noise: speech can be yellow too. Start with a pause, then follow the sound into the next word. Both panels use the same time, frequency and colour scales and come from the exact audio files below.

What to compareWhat to do with it
Straight lines across pausesLook for steady tonal noise, then use the connection checks above to narrow its source.
Bands that move with the wordsThese may belong to the voice. Do not remove every visible band.
The same lines remain after processingCompare the actual audio and try the targeted cleanup or recording checks below.

The hiss charts show 0–8,000 Hz; the hum charts zoom in to 0–800 Hz. Open a chart at full size for detail. A black area means little energy on this colour scale, not proof of perfect silence.

Recording credits

Recording credits: The Ashiel Mystery, read by Garth Comira; Sense and Sensibility, read by Heather Barnett; The Age of Chivalry, read by Anders Lankford. Audio from the LibriSpeech collection, adapted by Loudness.ai with added hum, noise reduction, playback alignment and level matching. The source recordings are licensed under CC BY 4.0.

Sign in to Loudness.ai